Basic Vocabulary
- Plaintiff: The person that brings the case to the court (The person that accuses)
- Defendant: The person that is being accused
Chapter 1: Admissions + Applications
- LSAT – Law School Admissions Test
- 5 parts- 1. Logic Games 2. Reading Comprehension 3.Arguments 4. Experimental 5. Short Essay
- CAS- service that assembles a report of transcript, LSAT…
- GPA + Recommendations
Chapter 2: Choosing a School
- ABA Accredited School
- Can Practice law in any state
- What is studied
- Common law- the history of case law in England + America
- Case law- rules of law found in court decism
- Statutory law- laws enacted by state legislatures by Congress
- State Accredited
- Only practice law in certain state
- Non-Accredited
- Not really reliable
- Choosing law school on ratings
- All law schools have the same skills and courses in the first year
- After that many electives
- All law schools have the same skills and courses in the first year
- Law Professors
- Research
- Publications in law reviews
- Edit case books
- Write books
- Accessibility needs to be considered
- Research
Chapter 3: First year Overview
- Fundamental First Year Classes
- Torts
- Legal Research + Writing
- Contracts
- Civil Procedure
- Criminal Law
- Real Property
- Constitutional Law
- These are tested on bar examination
- Current Trends in Teaching law
- Letter Grades
- More and more material to teach
- Society expands
Chapter 4: Torts
- Torts
- Tort is an ‘injury or wrong’
- Under Civil law, means may not necessarily be illegal but causes harm-> can still overlap within criminal law like trespassing
- Teaching methods
- Socratic Method
- Students already read texts
- Discuss in class
- Professors use class time to ask analytical questions and lead discussions on the text that was read for homework
- IRAC Method
- I- Issue of the law, the conflict
- R- Rule of Law, How law applied
- A- Analysis, discussion of facts of case + a applicable law
- C- Conclusion, A summary of all the facts + applied law + verdict
- Socratic Method
- Some Vocabulary
- Liability- responsibility for one’s conduct
- Tortfeasor- someone that commits a torts
- Tortious- conduct that subjects someone to liability because of a tort
- Intentional Tort
- Intends to cause harm/injury
- Against Person
- Assault, Apprehension of Immediate harmful contact
- Battery, harmful/offensive physical contact
- Assault v.s. Battery: Assault only needs apprehension from victim while Battery has to have actual physical contact
- Against property
- Trespassing
- Negligent Torts
- Failure to care to a certain degree
- That a normal reasonable person would in the same circumstances
- When plaintiff believes defendant has breached a ‘duty of care’
- Failure to care to a certain degree
- Strict Liability Tort
- “Strict liability exists when a defendant is liable for committing an action, regardless of what his/her intent or mental state was when committing the action.” – Cornell Law
- Does not have to be at fault, only needs to prove that tort has occurred and is caused by the defendant.
- This is applied to situations that are inherently dangerous
- A Mnemonic learning Device (Page 190) for dealing with Torts Questions
Chapter 5: Legal Research + Writing
- Legal Research and Writing- Teach how to find law in law library and write legal papers
- Substantive law
- structure/govern everyone in society
- Rights and responsibilities for civil law
- Crimes and punishments in criminal law
- Examples:
- Torts
- Contracts
- Wills
- Penal codes
- Procedural law
- Systems that are set to make, administer and enforce substantive law.
- How courts hear/resolve cases + how proceedings are governed
3 Basic sources of Law
- Codes
- Aka Statues, known collectively as statutory law
- Starting point of most research
- State Statutes
- Each state has a set of codes for various aspects of life
- Federal Statutes
- After passed by Congress, President signs it into law, it becomes codified
- Placed into United States code (USC)
- After passed by Congress, President signs it into law, it becomes codified
- Case law
- Derived from actual cases instead of codes/statutes
- Trials usually begin on county courts and are available online
- State Court Decisions
- Reports
- Written decisions of a state appeals court
- Appellate court/appeals court
- Can review cases from a lower court
- Review
- A review of the decision from a lower court can be requested through a appeals court
- Appellant/Petitioner
- The person that appeals the lower court decision
- Appellee/Respondent
- The person that is against repealing lower court decision
- Court decision’s contained the court’s opinion (reason for decision), laws that applied to case, and judgement
- Judgement
- Court’s decision on rights of the parties
- Reports
- Published opinions of appellate courts
- Majority opinion
- When all that review case disagree with court’s ruling
- Concurring opinion
- judges/justices want to emphasize a point
- Dissenting opinion
- Written by judge/justice that disagrees with majority opinion
- Majority opinion
- Binding v.s. Persuasive Authority
- Binding authority
- Lower courts have to follow rulings of higher courts in jurisdiction
- Persuasive authority
- Not required to follow decisions made by higher courts in other jurisdictions
- Binding authority
- Administrative law
- The decisions of administrative agencies
- Administrative agencies are made when a branch of government give some of their authority to group of people that are deemed experts in a particular field
- Example: DMV
- Branches of US government
- Legislative: Create law
- Executive: Enforces law
- Judicial:interprets law
- Shepardizing
- Means to verify that the information being cited is still ‘good law’ meaning it has not yet been overruled, modified, or criticized heavily.
- Citations
- Shorthand notation to identify and locate a source of law
- Where they are used
- Briefs, legal documents presented in court to prove why a party should win
- Legal memorandums, informal documents to aid parties involved in legal matters to remember points of law/facts
- Law review footnotes, a student run journal that publishes articles by law professors,..- other legal professionals
- The Bluebook is the basics of citation forms in legal matters
Chapter 6: Contract Law
- Contract, a legally enforceable promise
- Contract law shows to what extent promises that are legally binding can go
- Contract Vocabulary
- Assignee: the person that transfers (property, contract, other rights) from contract to another person
- Executor: Person to carry out terms of will
- Decedent: deceased person that writes the will
- Consideration
- A benefit that is agreed to by parties, the reason why the contract is made
- A necessary element for a valid contract
- Is the inducement to a contract
- May also be referred to as quid pro quo
- Latin term :‘This for that’ :bargain exchange
- Inducement: a promise that allows for parties to enter into agreement
- Briefing a case
- Similar to the IRAC approach in analyzing case law
- A student brief, a short summary + analysis of the case
- Sort out the parties
- Identify issues
- What was decided
- Analyze reasoning behind the decision
- Different ways of briefing cases
- The name of case
- Nature of case
- The form of action
- (Negligence, breach of contract, assault)
- Type of proceeding
- (appeal, summary judgment, demurrer)
- Summary judgement: put early end to lawsuit
- Demurrer: written response to complaint filed in lawsuit which basically asking to dismiss case because there is no legal basis for lawsuit
- Relief that is sought
- (criminal sanctions, monetary damages (material compensation))
- Example:”Appeal of a burglary conviction”
- The form of action
- Facts of case
- Brief summary of all facts
- The issue
- The rule of law put in form of ‘yes or no’ question
- The rule of law/legal rule
- The general principle that the court was applying to the case
- Analysis
- A summary of the events that happened
- Holding/conclusion of case
- Discussion of rule of a case + Court’s rationale
- Rationale: The reasoning behind the court’s decision
- Why cases are in law books
- To show the majority rule
- To show the minority/dissenting opinion
- This contains information called dicta
- Historical significance
- Decided wrong
- Sample case brief
- Elements to create a valid contract
- List
- Offer
- Acceptance
- Consideration
- Money
- Promise to do/not do something
- Mutuality
- Carry out considerations
- Certainty of terms
- Offer
- Written document
- Orally
- Conduct of parties
- Acceptance
- Must be be accepted to form contract
- Mutual assent
- Both offers and acceptances must be explicit in a contract. The statement “I might sell you my guitar for $400” would be considered an intent to negotiate rather than an actual offer. “Sure, I’ll give you $300 for it” or “Yes, if you include the case and some strings” would not be an acceptance because the terms “accepted” are not the terms originally offered; such a statement would be deemed a counter-offer.
- Applied words
- Conduct of parties
- Be in agreement based on actions even if the person didn’t officially sign the contract
- Consideration
- Inducement into contract
- The incentive/ the bargain
- Mutuality
- Both parties have to be responsible to perform agreement
- If this is not the case, no one is legally responsible
- Both parties have to be responsible to perform agreement
- Certainty
- The terms must be sufficiently definite
- List
- Defenses against ‘Breach of contract’
- Legality
- If the contract is illegal + Both parties have equal fault
- Statute of frauds
- A statute that states that certain contracts had to written and signed by the parties
- Capacity
- The state of the defendant while making the contract was compromised (Drunk, insane)
- Unconscionability
- Extreme unfairness in the ‘consideration’
- Mistake
- Fraud
- Undue influence
- When a party convinces another with their relationship
- When one has more authority
- When a party convinces another with their relationship
- Duress
- Wrongful pressure put on a party in the contract to agree to the contract
- Legality
- Compensations for ‘Breach of contract’
- Damages
- Compensates for resulting loss the nonbreaching party incurred because of the breach in contract
- Restitution
- Requires that the defendant return/forfeit the benefit that they unjustly received as a result of the contract
- Specific performance
- Breaching party has to carry out a specific order by court
- Example: the duties in the contract
- Breaching party has to carry out a specific order by court
- Damages
- Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
- Common law and UCC presides over contract law
- Governed by common law
- Real estate
- Services
- insurance
- intangible assets
- employment
- Governed by UCC
- Tangible objects
- goods
Chapter 7: Civil Procedure
- There are two separate court systems
- Federal court system (pg.77)
- Handles
- Military tribunals (courts martial)
- United states Tax court…(ETC)
- Criminal cases
- Bankruptcy
- Kidnapping
- Arson
- 2 special courts
- Court of International Trade
- International trade
- Customs
- U. S. Federal Claims
- Against the government
- Taking of private property
- Vaccine injury
- Court of International Trade
- Federal Appellate courts
- 13 courts of appeal for each district
- Supreme court is the highest court
- Chief justice + 8 associate justices
- Original jurisdiction/exclusive jurisdiction, if the parties can’t come to agreement, the supreme court is the only one that has authority to take jurisdiction
- Writ of certiorari
- Allows court to request documents from lower courts on cases they choose/they want to hear
- Certiorari is most commonly associated with the writ that the Supreme Court of the United States issues to review a lower court’s judgment. A case cannot, as a matter of right, be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. As such, a party seeking to appeal to the Supreme Court from a lower court decision must file a writ of certiorari.
- In the Supreme Court, if four Justices agree to review the case, then the Court will hear the case. This is referred to as “granting certiorari,”[ If four Justices do not agree to review the case, the Court will not hear the case. This is defined as denying certiorari.
- Cases are usually selected when there are important questions on the constitution/federal law
- Separated into 13 districts
- Handles
- State + territorial court systems (pg. 81)
- Each state or territory in the United States has their own system of courts
- The only time cases from state courts cross into the federal court system is if a case reviewed by the state supreme court is appealed into the U.S. Supreme Court
- State courts are of general jurisdiction, they hear all cases outside of the federal courts
- Federal courts deal with federal laws, while state courts deal with state laws
- Each state has different laws because each state has different histories and developments
- Cases start with lower courts the trial courts
- Jurisdiction, the power/authority to hear/determine a case
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Personal jurisdiction deals with the power of a court to bring all parties involved before it and to create a resolution to the case
- Personal jurisdiction can occur in two ways,
- Personal service within state (service of process)
- Legal notice to the party in question in advance
- Notice= copy of complaint+summons to appear in court
- Voluntary appearance of defendant to defend themselves
- Personal service within state (service of process)
- Direct Attack
- Special appearance
- If defendant appears in the court’s state to challenge the court’s authority to assert jurisdiction over them, the defendant is not subjecting themself to the jursidiction
- General appearance
- Not going to court to challenge the court’s authority to assert jurisdiction
- Submitted themself to court’s jurisdiction
- Can defend on merits of case without being able to object to the jurisdiction
- Direct attack, attempt to avoid/correct a judicial proceeding by manner of law
- Special appearance
- Collateral attack, doesn’t enter the case and allows a default judgement
- Default judgement, defendant doesn’t appear in court/respond to summon, judgement made in favor of plaintiff
- After this judgement, defendant would make an appearance to claim a lack of personal jurisdiction
- Evolution of Personal Jurisdiction
- Domicile, the individual’s permanent home
- Minimum contacts, party (particularly a corporation) has to have a minimum number of contacts in a state to to avoid unfairness when tried in another state
- Other types of Jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction over property
- in rem jurisdiction, jurisdiction over a thing instead of a person
- From Latin, “against a thing.” Concerning the status of a particular piece of property.
- For instance, in-rem jurisdiction refers to the power of a court over an item of real or personal property. The “thing” over which the court has power may be a piece of land or even a marriage. Thus, a court with only in-rem jurisdiction may terminate a marriage or declare who owns a piece of land. In-rem jurisdiction is based on the location of the property and enforcement follows property rather than person.
- quasi in rem jurisdiction, court’s power to attach property to get jurisdiction over someone
- Largely abolished except in certain circumstances
- in rem jurisdiction, jurisdiction over a thing instead of a person
- Subject matter jurisdiction, restriction on type of case that a court can hear
- Limited jurisdiction, when a court is limited to a certain type of case such as probate/divorce
- General jurisdiction, the court can hear any type of case
- Original jurisdiction
- Governs trial courts
- Authority to hear case first
- Appellate jurisdiction, job is to review the record of trial courts
- Federal jurisdiction
- Federal courts have limited jurisdiction
- State courts have general jurisdiction
- Concurrent jurisdiction, 2 different courts have the power to hear a case
- Exclusive jurisdiction, Only one court has the authority to hear the case
- Jurisdiction over property
- Diversity Jurisdiction
- Venue, the geographic area in a judicial district where a suit should be brought to based on how much the interests of justice/convenience of parties are met
- Pleadings + Discovery
- Pleading, formal written statement of a party’s view/claims/defenses to the other party’s claims, meant to give a view into the basic positions
- Complaint, answer, reply, counterclaim
- Discovery, pretrial procedure where the parties can get evidence from each other from devices such as
- Request for answers to interrogatories
- Request for documents to be produced
- Request for depositions/admissions
- Personal Jurisdiction
Chapter 8: Criminal Law
- There are 2 types of criminal law in the U.S.
- Substantive criminal law
- Defines what is criminal
- Gives the punishment that should be enforced as a result
- Procedural criminal law, procedures to investigate and prosecute criminal behavior
- Substantive criminal law
- actus reus + mens rea
- actus reus, ‘guilty act’ commit a criminal act
- mens rea, ‘guilty mind’ have intent that deserves blame
- For something to be a crime, the person has to intend to to do something that state legislature/congress has deemed to be a wrong: has to be criminal intent
- Concept is based on belief that only those that have acted in a way that makes them morally in the wrong should be punished
- Some crimes do not require mens rea
- Strict liability laws-> social benefits of strict rules outweigh harms of punishing someone morally innocent
- Statutory rape laws
- Sale of alcohol to minors
- Crimes are put into categories:
- Felonies
- Misdemeanors
- Infractions (violations)
- Minor offenses that can be covered by a fine and no jail time
- Felonies and misdemeanors
- Punishments
- Felonies can have a more severe punishment such as capital punishment, or imprisonment for >1 year
- Misdemeanors have less severe punishment such as fine, probation, community service, confinement < 1 year
- Nature
- Felonies are the most serious type of criminal offense
- Homicide (murder, manslaughter), robbery, rape, grand larceny… ETC
- Each felony has specific elements to be met for the defendant to be found guilty
- Misdemeanors
- Public intoxication, vagrancy, assault + battery… ETC
- Felonies are the most serious type of criminal offense
- Punishments
- Category of crimes
- Personal Crimes (injury or harming of wellbeing to another individual)
- Assault
- Battery
- False imprisonment
- Homicide
- Rape
- Property Crime (interfering with right to property)
- Larceny (theft)
- Robbery
- Burglary
- Inchoate Crime (Incomplete crimes, a substantial step was missing from crime)
- Any crime that has been attempted
- Conspiracy
- Solicitation
- Statutory Crime (Violation of state/federal statutes)
- Alcohol related crime
- Sale of Alcohol to a minor
- Defenses against crimes :Infancy, insanity, intoxication, justifiable use of force, duress
- Personal Crimes (injury or harming of wellbeing to another individual)
- Civil v.s. Criminal Law
- Civil cases= disputes between individuals, Criminal= against the state
- Civil law= injured party, plaintiff Criminal=injured party either people of state/U.S.
- Federal system=the jury must have a unanimous verdict, State(⅓ states)=only majority
- Civil case= defendant is liable or not liable, Criminal=guilty or not guilty
- Civil case= appeal by either party, Criminal case= only defendant can appeal
- Criminal procedure, protect individual rights while going against the government
- Constitutional Safeguards, for those accused
- 4th Amendment, Protected from unreasonable seizure/search
- Evidence that is obtained illegally must be excluded from trial
- 4th Amendment, Warrant for arrest has to have a probable cause
- 5th Amendment, Can’t be deprived of life/liberty/property without trial (due process of law)
- 5th Amendment, Against Double Jeopardy=Can’t try someone twice
- 6th Amendment, Guarantee speedy trial, by jury, public trail,… ETC.
- Right to attorney, if defendant can’t pay for someone, they are provided one
- Against excessive bails, and cruel/unusual punishment
- 5th Amendment, against self-incrimination
- 4th Amendment, Protected from unreasonable seizure/search
- Federal Exclusionary Rule
- After the case of Mapp v. Ohio, The Supreme court ruled that evidence that has been obtained illegally (against the 4th amendment) can’t be used against someone in court
- Police need to get a warrant to search cell phones even during a lawful arrest
- Automobile exception: allows search of lawfully stopped vehicle
Chapter 9: Property Law
- Real Property v. Personal Property
- Real Property (real estate/immoveable property), land ownership and possession
- Personal property, movable items anything that isn’t ‘real property’
- Tangible,Physical property (something that can be touched)
- Intangible, non-physical (debts, copyrights, trademarks, patents)
- The purchases, sales, possession of property comes from the English common law
- Developed in England in the 11th century
- Stare decisis: applying historical cases to similar cases in precedent/future rulings by judges
- Adverse Possession, a way of getting ownership of property by occupying it for some time with intention to own it
- Property can be occupied by someone that doesn’t own it
- The title holder of the property has the responsibility to expel unrightful occupants of the land by a certain time.
- If this and some other conditions are met, the titleholder that doesn’t meet the obligation can lose the rights to the property
- The conditions of adverse possession
- Actual
- Show open use of land in the intent of owning it
- Act like you own the land
- Hostile/Under claim of right
- Knowing that the land isn’t theirs but still speaking as if it is their own f
- Open and Notorious,Possess the land openly for everyone to see
- Improving + cultivating land demonstrates this
- Owner should know about this/or really notorious use most people know
- Exclusive, claimant has exclusive occupancy
- Can have joint possession
- Actual
- Actual possession
- When adverse possessor improves, cultivates, encloses property
- Basically acts like the rightful owner
- Prescriptive easement,
- Usually happens when the land is used to access other property like a driveway
- Can happen when neighbor begins to use part of adjoining property
- This gives legal right to use the property but not the ownership
- Easements, the right to use/cross property for a reason
- Affirmative easement
- Right to do something on someone else’s land
- Example: Can travel on road on others’ property
- Negative easement
- Holder can prevent granter from doing something legal on their own land
- Example: holder can build something that obscures light/view
- Creation by
- express grant
- Implication
- Necessity
- Adverse possession
- Termination by
- If created by necessity and it isn’t necessary anymore
- Land is destroyed
- Easement abandoned
- Eminent domain, the right of government/its agent to take private property to use publicly with payment as compensation
- Affirmative easement
- Possessory Estates
- Estate, interest in land that might become possessory in a certain period of time
- Fee simple, can potentially last forever like absolute ownership
- Fee tail, can potentially last forever, but will end if the first fee tail tenant doesn’t have any lineal descendants to take possession of estate
- Life estates, end after tenant dies
- Leasehold estates, last for fixed time, or from period to period until the landlord/tenant wants to terminate
- Estate, interest in land that might become possessory in a certain period of time
- Future Interests, non possessory interests that can potentially become possessory
- Interest doesn’t give current right to ownership
Chapter 10: Evidence
- Criminal law v. Criminal Procedure + Evidence
- In Criminal law, the focus on if the a crime happened or not, the type of crime and what defenses are to the crime
- In Criminal Procedure, the focus is on the process of the investigation when prosecuting the accused
- Evidence governs the presentation of facts
- Burden of Proof
- The prosecution’s job in a criminal case is to prove the guilt of defendant ‘beyond reasonable doubt’
- In a civil case, the accusor only needs to prove responsibility by ‘preponderance of the evidence’ which means that there is greater than 50% of responsibility
- This shows that a civil case requires a lower amount of certainty in the proof
- The Brady Rule
- Based on Brady v. Maryland
- The supreme court ruled that the prosecution was to turn over all exculpatory evidence
- Exculpatory evidence, evidence that can prove that the defendant isn’t responsible
- The prosecution has to disclose information and evidence even when it is favorable to the defendant
- Types of Evidence
- Real evidence, physical objects like a weapon
- Demonstrative, a model of what might have happened
- Documentary, any kind of documentation
- Testimonial, witness account
- Circumstantial evidence, evidence that can support the case depending on the situation, also known as indirect evidence
- Direct evidence, supports the claim directly, an example being a witness seeing defendant shooting victim
- Corroborating evidence, evidence that when compared with other evidence can strengthen and add to the authenticity of existing evidence
- Hearsay, a statement that made outside of court that can be used as proof/evidence
- Goal of this rule is to make sure the evidence at trial is as authentic as possible
- Presumptions, conclusions that triers of fact (judge/jury) are supposed to get from the evidence presented.
- Burdens of proof in evidence
- Burden of production, evidence that show facts exist
- Burden of persuasion, evidence that is meant to persuade trier of fact
- Other Rule of Evidence
- Judicial notice,accepting a fact without formal proof (EX: sunset, sunrise, tides)
- Relevance, if evidence proves/disproves a fact (has to prove something, guilty/not guilty)
- Privileges
- Examination/impeachment of witnesses,
- Best evidence rule, a legal principle that says the original version of a document is the best authentication
- Exclusionary rule, excludes evidence that is obtained illegally/by violating defendant’s rights (14th amendment)
- Due process, everyone is entitled to safeguards that make sure a trial is fair
- Assisted with a lawyer
- Neutral decision maker
Chapter 11: Constitutional Law
- U.S. Constitution
- The main law, the supreme law of the land/super law
- Any laws that violate the constitution are invalid
- State constitutions are also supreme inside the state, as long as it doesn’t interfere with the constitution
- Constitutional rights, individual liberties granted by state/government which protects the citizens from interference from the government
- Articles of constitution
- Article I, gives power to the legislature to create laws
- Article II, shows how laws should be executed by the executive branch
- Article III, defines laws for the judicial branch
- Judicial Review, power given to federal courts that allows them to review the actions of the other two branches and deem them to be unconstitutional: therefore invalid
- This doctrine was established by a landmark case called Marbury v. Madison (1803)
- Background
- Marbury was appointed as justice of peace for D.C
- James Madison was Thomas Jefferson’s secretary of state
- Madison refused to carry out Marbury’s commision
- Marbury + 3 other colleagues of similar status petitioned to get a writ of mandamus
- This is when a superior court has the power to command a public official/lower to perform a specific duty
- Issues of the Case
- Did Marbury have the right to receive this commission
- Yes
- Can he sue for this commission in court
- No, Chief Justice John Marshall held that it was unconstitutional because it was outside of the court’s jurisdiction
- (In article III, section 2, clause 2) (pg.135)
- Does the Supreme court have the authority to order madison
- No
- Did Marbury have the right to receive this commission
- After this, Justice Marshall established the principle of judicial review
- Original + Appellate Jurisdiction
- Original Jurisdiction, the authority of a court to make a decision on a case based on a trial and its evidence instead of reviewing cases and their procedures
- Appellate Jurisdiction, refers to power that protects from legal procedural errors, bias and other wrongs that might occur in a court
- Supreme Court
- Most cases are appellate jurisdiction
- Judicial review comes from Article VI, Clause 2 (supreme clause) and Article III, Section 2
- Certiorari, a way of getting the Supreme court to hear a case which is based on federal and chosen by 4/9 of the justices known as a grant.
- Before 1988, the two ways for a case to be brought to the Supreme court were by appeal or certiorari.
- In 1988, Congress eliminated almost all of the appeal process, so now most of the cases that are heard get there by certiorari
- Supreme + lower federal courts will only hear cases that are justiciable
- Justiciability
- Court can’t offer an advisory opinion
- Advisory opinions are opinions that are submitted by courts that don’t have impact on the decision but advises on interpretation of law
- Plaintiff has to have standing
- The legal right to even start a lawsuit
- Has to have injury in fact, ‘invasion of legally protected interest’
- cause /effect relationship between injury + the conduct
- Likelihood that the injury can be corrected by a favorable verdict
- Issues must be ripe, can’t be moot
- Mootness, when the actual controversy no longer exist, there would be no actual impact by the court’s decision
- Issues can’t go against the political question doctrine
- A court won’t hear a question that could be better resolved by another branch of the government due to its political nature
- Bill of rights, the first 10 amendments to the U.S Constitution which contain the rights for citizens
- Court can’t offer an advisory opinion
Chapter 12: Legal Writing + Research Revisited
- Office memorandum and the brief are 2 of the most used kinds of documents by attorneys in their daily work
- Law Office Memorandum, a ‘document of legal writing’
- Open memorandum, have to find primary authorities for the memo
- Closed memorandum, only need to use authorities provided
- Primary authority, legal research term that ‘refers to statements of law that are binding upon the courts, governments and individuals’
- Key elements
- Heading,
- the author of memo
- who it was written to
- what it is about
- date
- Questions
- Presented, statement of legal questions that are to be answered
- Short Answer
- A short answer for each of the questions presented
- Statement of Facts
- Objective description of facts that are of legal importance in relation to the issue
- Discussion
- Issues + sub issues that come up with the problem
- Conclusion
- Longer version describing how the problem is solved + problems presented by problem
- Heading,
- Legal Brief
- A document used by a lawyer to persuade the court that their client is in the right, and to persuade them that they should make a decision in favor of their client
- Import to make arguments clear, concise and engaging by getting to the point instead of using too many details
Chapter 15: Recap
- Torts and Contracts classes teach what lawyers do in civil court
- Civil Procedure teaches how lawyers carry out their jobs in Civil court
- Criminal Procedure is about the procedures in Criminal Law
- Evidence is taught as a basic tool
- Real Property teaches basics on law regarding possessions and land
- Constitutional Law goes into the powers and differences between different branches of government
- Legal Writing and Research is also taught as a basic tool for attorneys to learn further